Protesters Have No Free-Speech Rights on Supreme Court's Front PorchWashington PostAug. 29, 2015 |
Mike Johnson Pushes Debunked Lie That Israeli Babies Were 'Cooked in Ovens' On October 7
'Sniper Seen on Roof Overlooking Pro-Palestine Protest' at Indiana University
'It Has to Be Stopped': Netanyahu Demands Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Colleges Be Shut Down
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
'These Protesters Belong in Jail': Gov. Abbott Cheers Arrest of Pro-Palestine Protesters at UT Austin
Protesters do not have a First Amendment right to congregate on the grand marble plaza in front of the Supreme Court, only on the sidewalk in front of it, a unanimous federal appeals court panel ruled Friday. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a law that forbids demonstrations on the grounds of the high court, on the premise that demonstrations on the court's doorsteps might lead to the perception that the court is swayed by public opinion rather than the dictates of the law. The law, passed in 1949, "promotes the understanding that the Court resolves the matters before it without regard to political pressure or public opinion," wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan, who has argued often before the court as a lawyer and is sometimes mentioned as a future inhabitant of the Supreme Court building. "Allowing demonstrations directed at the Court, on the Court's own front terrace, would tend to yield the opposite impression: that of a Court engaged with-- and potentially vulnerable to -- outside entreaties by the public." Read More |