The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Jan 16 2013, 4:45 PM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: William Norman Grigg Print

Private Pilot Nearly Shot Down for Violating 'Secret No-Fly Zone'

by William Norman Grigg

Last July, the Small Wars Journal published an essay co-written by retired U.S. Army Colonel Kevin Benson entitled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” That article presented a speculative case study of domestic military operations to put down a domestic insurrection that would seize control of the unremarkable town of Darlington, South Carolina.

In the scenario painted by Col. Benson and his co-author, Professor Jennifer Weber of the University of Kansas, a militia inspired by the Tea Party movement seized control of Darlington’s municipal government, erects checkpoints “on major transportation lines,” and imposes a form of martial law in which “citizens who complain are immediately detained.” The governor of South Carolina invokes the Insurrection Act, leading to a “full-spectrum” response by the U.S. military.

Shortly after that essay was published, 70-year-old private pilot Robin Fleming learned that Darlington County – or at least the airspace above it – is already subject to a form of martial law.

Fleming, who belongs to the Bermuda High Soaring aviation club in Lancaster, South Carolina, went for an afternoon glider flight last July in Darlington County. His course briefly took him over the HB Robinson Nuclear Generating Station near Lake Robinson. As he was preparing to return to Lancaster, Fleming lost radio contact with the other members of the club. Hours passed as his friends imagined the worst. Finally they filed a missing aircraft report, and a search began. To their relief, Fleming contacted them – only to leave them horrified when they learned what had happened.

After Fleming passed over the power plant, he was ordered to land his glider, which he did as soon as prevailing wind currents permitted. Once he was down on the ground, Fleming was swarmed by law enforcement.

Fleming was informed that he had violated a “secret no-fly zone.” This was an entirely spurious claim: There is no such thing as a domestic "no-fly zone," secret or otherwise. That term, significantly, is used to describe aerial blockades imposed by the military – generally under the purported authority of a multilateral body, such as the UN or one of its regional affiliates – against a "rogue nation," such as Iraq or Libya. The Homeland Security Department apparently considers itself entitled to impose similar restrictions wherever it chooses, and do so without bothering to inform civilian pilots or make suitable notations on FAA-produced sectional aviation charts.

Despite the fact that he had done nothing wrong, Fleming was handcuffed, charged with “breach of peace,” and held for more than 24 hours before being interrogated by FBI and Homeland Security officials. The charges were dismissed after he showed the investigators that the zone wasn’t marked in aviation charts – but he was required to sign a document promising that he wouldn’t file a lawsuit against the officials who had illegally detained him. He later learned that local police officials had made preparations to shoot down his glider if he hadn’t landed as quickly as he did.

Fleming did nothing illegal – yet he was brutalized by people who had been prepared to kill him, and could have done so without consequences. Such is life in our Homeland Security State.
William Norman Grigg [send him mail] publishes the Pro Libertate blog and hosts the Pro Libertate radio program.

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct
- Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free
- Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects
- 'War On Cops': Cop Stages Fake Shootout, Sets Own Cruiser On Fire, Calls In Bomb Threat to School
- Cop Caught Stealing Cash & Gold Chain From Dying Crash Victim Loses Pension
- Innocent Man Beaten By Cops After Being Mistook For Suspect Now Paralyzed
- Ex-CIA Director Wants Snowden 'Hanged By The Neck Until He's Dead'
- Police as Prey: What a Real "War On Cops" Looks Like

Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 12:11 AM

69209 The problem is not even with the so called law enforcement. Here's where it is:

"When his attorney returned and said the case would be dismissed if he agreed not to take any legal action against Darlington County law enforcement, he reluctantly agreed". So, without any legal cause whatsoever, the police made threat to kill him (terrorist threat), then arrested him on bogus charges on breaching peace (false arrest), then intimidated him with further false imprisonment if he does not promise not to sue them. And he agreed.

Next time they _will_ shoot him. Or someone else.

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 12:21 AM

69209 Also note this ridiculous whining about lack of training. "Homeland Security is taking these matters seriously", " better educational efforts of law enforcement authorities" etc.

Seriously? the people from Sheriff's department came, looed at the situation, and told tell the cops that there was no law violated, after which turned away and left. So by the time of arrest, the cops knew 100% well that they had no grounds. They also knew that they have no authority to demand landing of an aircraft. Yet they did it. After which they went forward and charged him with ridiculous and patently irrelevant "breach of peace" charge. If this was not malicious prosecution, I don't know what is. Finally, they did their best to cover their racket by demanding that he does not sue them. Gotta like the attorney who advised his client to agree to this blackmail.

No, it's not about lack of training at all. it's about the chain of fully conscious crimes committed by Darlington law enforcement on that day.

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 2:22 AM

65110 Why did a militia group set up checkpoints there? To give the regular military justification to have their little test area? The whole episode looks like a setup.

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 3:26 AM

9885 If they can disobey the law and threaten anyone without and harm, then guess what, so can we!! You get what you give bitches! It's time!

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 12:38 PM

6674 He could argue the signature was made under duress.

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 12:44 PM

687 the real loons of this country are in charge of the U/S..

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 1:34 PM

75145 "and the charges were eventually dropped (after he agreed not to file suit)."


"we know that you are innocent, and we also know that we have committed a crime. Because of that, we can't let you go unless you promise that you won't go after us."

That's what we call Law Enforcement. Indeed, if they were genuine mafia, the "unless" part would be replaced by two bullets in the head. Darlington County officials are definitely making good progress.

Posted: Jan 27 2013, 12:41 AM

70190 but he was required to sign a document promising that he wouldn’t file a lawsuit against the officials who had illegally detained him. this is duress and is unenforceable in any HONEST court!
He should sue them all til they are homeless!!!
Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects - 11/23Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend' - 11/24Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free - 11/24Undercover Cop Dressed In All Black Shot While Placing GPS Tracker On Car - 11/20NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct - 11/24WeAreChange Blocked in France Because of New Censorship Law - 11/24VIDEO: Hillary Fans Voice Support For Her 'Plan to Repeal 4th Amendment' - 11/24AZ State Supreme Court Rules Cannabis In The Blood Does Not Constitute Impairment - 11/24

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up