It Literally Started With A Witch Hunt: A History Of Bite Mark EvidenceBy Radley BalkoFeb. 18, 2015 |
Fmr IDF Soldier And Jewish Professor Bravely Intimidate Muslim Women at Pro-Israel Protest
'Target Israel And We Will Target You': AIPAC-Funded U.S. Senators Threaten ICC Prosecutor
Alan Dershowitz: 'Any University That Divests from Israel Should Have Its Federal Funding Terminated'
Blinken Blames Social Media for Israel Losing PR War; Romney Agrees, Confirms TikTok Ban is to Help Israel
House Passes 'Antisemitism Awareness Act' to Silence Criticism of Israel as Hate Speech
On May 4, 1692, the Rev. George Burroughs was arrested in Salem, Massachusetts on suspicion of witchcraft. The only physical evidence against Burroughs were bite marks found on some of the girls he was accused of recruiting to join him. Summarizing the research of historians on the ordeal in an article for the February 2014 newsletter of the New York State Dental Association, William James Maloney writes that at trial, “the defendant’s mouth was pried open and the prosecution compared his teeth with the teeth marks left on the bodies of several injured girls present in the courtroom.” At the urging of notorious witch hunter Cotton Mather, Burroughs was convicted, sentenced to death and hanged. Two months later, the governor of Massachusetts called for an end to the witchcraft trials. He also prohibited the use of “spectral and intangible evidence” in criminal trials. Two decades later, Burroughs was declared innocent, and the colony of Massachusetts compensated his children for their father’s wrongful execution. Read More |