informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Analysis posted Oct 14 2013, 7:16 AM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: InformationLiberation Print

Deputies Raid Home For 'Smelling Like Meth Lab,' Kill 80-Year-Old Homeowner, Find No Meth, Say Son's Pot Evidence Of 'Drug Operation' Nonetheless

Chris | InformationLiberation

A Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputy smelled what he thought was the scent of a meth lab coming from 80-year-old Eugene Mallory's home in Littlerock. The deputy's subjective olfactory sensations were apparently enough "probable cause" for a judge to sign off on a warrant to raid the elderly man's home. When deputies raided his house, they claim he pulled a gun on them, so they shot and killed him immediately.

Sherrif's department spokesman Steve Whitmore told KTLA the officers shot him in self-defense.

“Age does not preclude somebody from being aggressive toward deputies,” Whitmore said, acknowledging they shot an elderly person.

“The lesson here, and obviously, forgive me for stating the obvious, is that; don’t pull a gun on a deputy.”

In other words, we can pull guns on you and invade your home because we smell something fishy, but if you pull a gun on us as we invade your home armed to the teeth we can kill you without batting an eyelid.

After murdering the man for attempting to defend himself, the police searched his home and found no evidence of any meth operation, but they did find some marijuana in another part of his property inhabited by his wife's son.

When confronted on the lack of any meth operation, Whitmore acknowledged none was found, but responded, "No, but I believe marijuana was [found], and marijuana equipment was [found], and so there was a 'drug operation' that certainly was going on within this house."

And yes, he emphasizes "drug operation" as though it's in quotes, consciously acknowledging he's is a bald faced liar.

Watch the video from KTLA News:



Update: Mallory's widow's lawyers have released a statement saying he stopped driving recently because he couldn't grip a steering wheel and he no longer had the dexterity to shave himself. They said the trajectory of the bullets suggest he was sitting up in his bed when he was shot.
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Canadian PM Vows To Take Away Citizens' Rights In Response To Parliament Attacker
- NYPD Officer Mistakes Fellow Cop For Suspect, Kicks Him In The Head
- Why 'Good Cops' Stay Silent, Continued
- Protesters Who Planned To Smash 'Police Brutality' Pumpkins Arrested For Littering, Assault
- New Hampshire Supreme Court Takes Up Meter Feeding
- "No Refusal" Blood Draw Checkpoint Planned for Ohio
- NYPD Looking Into Arrest Of Subway Performer After Video Goes Viral; Arrest Voided
- Fla. Sheriff May Be Liable For His Deputy Arresting Man For Videotaping









Comments 1 - 20 of 37 Add Comment Page of 2 >
Travis Watters

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 1:07 PM

Link
24207 This is criminal. How long is this kind of thing going to continue before people stand up and say "ENOUGH!!!!!!"
Travis Watters

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 1:12 PM

Link
24207 ps. This isn't about drugs. The charge should be Murder
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 1:21 PM

Link
68115 OUT FUCKING RAGIOUS
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 1:23 PM

Link
5078 i think it is is "bold" face liar... right?
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 1:48 PM

Link
72229 Someone should kick that pig in the teeth.
dougo

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 2:26 PM

Link
68107 this is about the out of control demanding the right to totally control others with lies and and various other threats all the way to execution on the spot as the penalty for any immediate non-compliance.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 2:48 PM

Link
7160 Wow f the pigs
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 3:17 PM

Link
18490 The violence and terrorism against the citizens of the United States won't end until we start putting cops in prison.
FUCK YOU COPS

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 5:05 PM

Link
99125 You scared the shit out of an 80 year old man for some drug bs...the war on drugs destroys lives and you ass holes do it for profit. Stop pretending that you are the good guys....you're not.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 5:24 PM

Link
7521 Wondering, was there a video showing how "he pulled a gun on them"?

Or it's just their word?
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 5:59 PM

Link
107200 Fuck you idiots and the dumbass old man. He should have known better at 80.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 8:14 PM

Link
114174 The movie Training day anyone??
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 8:17 PM

Link
20994 This type of shit is going to eventually cause a rampage
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2013, 10:14 PM

Link
24172 https://www.facebook.com/LosAngelesCountySheriffsDepartment


LA SHERIFF FACEBOOK PAGE
Let them know how you feel!
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 12:33 AM

Link
142165 No, it's "bald faced". I like the claim from the author that he can read the spokesperson's mind. "Consciously acknowledging" blah blah. You lose credibility with statements like that and phrases like "probably cause". It's "probable".
Chris

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 2:55 AM

Link
Bold faced and bald faced are both correct, as to "probably" thank you for catching the typo, it has been corrected. I feel his emphasis on "drug operation" was to imply it was a drug operation "of sorts," even if not a meth operation. He was stretching the truth, which in my book is a flat out lying.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 3:06 AM

Link
142165 It could be argued that you are reading into his choice of words, or perhaps his inflection, and drawing the conclusion that he is lying based on your own prejudices. It would appear that you are allowing your personal feelings toward law enforcement officialsto colour your writing. Something that a journalist should try to avoid.
Chris

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 4:24 AM

Link
Of course it colors my writing, everyone's views color their writings, that includes drab state-stenographers who "only report the facts" and print politicos' bald faced lies without any counterpoints.

Truth is my opinion on law enforcement actually allows me to see these situations more clearly than most, most people think having a badge and gun means you're in the right, no matter what you do. It takes a more rational mind to strip the people of their costumes and judge their actions on their own merit.

In this case, for example, the state goon-squad invaded an innocent man's home and murdered him for posturing in self-defense, they then justified their murder by claiming self-defense besides being the aggressors, and said because they found some vegetation politicians 90 years ago deemed "illegal" their murder was justified, despite their original intention being to bust someone for producing chemicals other politicians deemed illegal.

To wage an armed invasion of someone's home because you thought you smelled them making chemicals, then murder them for trying to defend themselves, and justify the murder by claiming self-defense and saying you were in the right because you found some pot in his son's room and that proves you right is what destroys your credibility -- Not pointing out said homicidal maniacs are in fact homicidal maniacs.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 11:27 AM

Link
20483 You have admitted to, and demonstrated, great bias in your writing. While you keep returning to this story in an attempt to justify calling people you don't know and have never met homicidal maniacs and liars, I am only criticizing your presentation of a biased opinion as fact. Just like you, I was not present at the scene and do not know the reality of the sequence of events. It is very likely that an alternative to shooting the man could have been attempted. However, as I said, I have no idea what exactly went on in that home, so I simply don't know what was, or was not, justified in this situation. Therefore, I would not be right to draw conclusions about what happened based solely on a press conference speech and the vocal inflections of the speaker, just as you are not right to do so.

A couple of quick points in response to your last post:

- Calling police officers a "goon squad" only weakens your point and presents further evidence that you are not an impartial journalist
- I am not sure it's fair to say that they (the police) are saying killing the man was justified because they found marijuana. It is far more accurate to say they are saying that shooting him was justifiable because he presented them with a mortal threat (a firearm). It seems to me that they are saying the drug raid, not the fatal shooting, was justifiable because of the marijuana.

To call this site a "news" source is inaccurate, as you are presenting a biased point of view and presenting your opinions (the speaker is a liar; these police officers are homicidal maniacs) as facts. These are not facts, these are your opinions. Perhaps you should call your site "Information Liberation: Here's my opinion about this news story".
Chris

Posted: Oct 15 2013, 12:37 PM

Link
LOL, thanks for the laugh!
Comments 1 - 20 of 37 Page of 2 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Mission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement' - 10/23Chicago Cop Who Assaulted 89-Yr-Old For Requesting He Stop Cursing Gets 3 Years - 10/23Doctor Assaulted by Police at Dying Son's Birthday, Tasered so Many Times He Had a Heart Attack - 10/23The Compassion Of the State: Town Sells Mom's Home At Auction Over Unpaid $95 Tax Bill She Was Never Notified About - 10/23Call the Suicide Prevention Hotline -- Get Killed by a SWAT Team - 10/23Man Brutalized & Stopped Over 20 Times in 5 Weeks by Cops Mistaking Him for Murderer - 10/23Either Praise the Police, or Shut Up - 10/22Exonerated Woman Contests 675-Day Lockup - 10/23

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top