informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted May 29 2012, 7:09 AM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: EFF.org Print

TV Networks Say You're Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials

BY MITCH STOLTZ, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Television networks are having a busy month trying to stamp out new TV-watching technology, including telling a court that skipping a commercial while watching a recorded show is illegal. Yesterday, Fox, NBC, and CBS all sued Dish Network over its digital video recorder with automatic commercial-skipping. The same networks, plus ABC, Univision, and PBS, are gearing up for a May 30 hearing in their cases against Aereo, a New York startup bringing local broadcast TV to the Internet.  EFF and Public Knowledge filed an amicus brief supporting Aereo this week.

The suits against Dish are a response to the "Hopper" DVR and its "Auto Hop" feature, which automatically skips over commercials. According to the networks' complaints, the Hopper automatically records eight days' worth of prime time programming on the four major networks that subscribers can play back on request. Beginning a few hours after the broadcast, viewers can choose to watch a program sans ads.

These suits are yet another in a long and ignominious series of lawsuits by content owners seeking to control the features of personal electronic devices, and to capture for themselves the value of new technologies no matter who invents them. We've seen this movie before. Most directly, the Dish suits look like a replay of the 2002 suit against DVR maker ReplayTV.  The networks sued ReplayTV for copyright infringement based on another automated commercial-skip feature.  They claimed that viewers were infringing copyright when they skipped ads during playback, that skipping "robs the advertisers," and that ReplayTV should be responsible.  EFF argued then, and in a later suit on behalf of Replay's customers, that choosing not to watch ads during playback is pretty far from being a violation of federal law. Unfortunately, the cost of the suit drove ReplayTV out of business before the court could rule on the networks' wacky theory.

Fast forward ten years.  The networks are accusing Dish of "inducing" copyright infringement. That's a legal theory first created in the record labels' case against peer-to-peer software maker Grokster.  The problem for the networks is that a technology maker, service, or other middleman can't be held liable for inducing copyright infringement unless their customers are actually infringing. And that means the networks will have to convince a judge that people who record a TV show, and later decide to skip over the commercials during playback, are violating federal law.

Dish is fighting back hard, filing its own lawsuit in New York to have its devices ruled legal. Hopefully, the courts won't turn millions of American commercial-skippers into lawbreakers.





Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- VP Joe Biden Believes There's 'No Legal Reason' The Government Can't Slap A Sin Tax On 'Violent Media'
- College Students Petition to Ban Black Backpacks After Boston Bombing
- State Department orders firm to remove 3D-printed guns web blueprints
- CNN: Will 3D Printers Make It Easier For Terrorist Operate Gun Factories In Their Homes?
- Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?
- ICE Starts Raiding Mobile Phone Repair Shops To Stop Repairs With Aftermarket Parts
- DOJ Wants To Be Able To Fine Tech Companies Who Don't Let It Wiretap Your Communications
- CPS Takes Baby After Mom Asks For Second Opinion From Doctor









Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: May 29 2012, 10:47 AM

Link
108205 Way to go, Dish!!!
Anonymous

Posted: May 30 2012, 9:36 PM

Link
2420 oh wow! that is some crazy stuff, even watching 4 channels at the same time. they are on it.
Anonymous

Posted: May 31 2012, 8:57 AM

Link
8234 Sensationalist title. Absolute rubbish.

This lawsuit is against a digital box which automatically removes adverts. Since adverts are how TV stations fund themselves, this is a reasonable lawsuit.

This is NOT criminalizing people for going to make a cup of tea or take a leak during a break. Utter hogwash.
Anonymous

Posted: May 31 2012, 3:17 PM

Link
68227 Bullcrap. I pay $120/month for these channels. I'll skip commercials if I please.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 01 2012, 4:33 PM

Link
10829 Some advertiser are appropriate for kids so Thumb Up Dish
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 03 2012, 12:51 AM

Link
20476 I think the title of this article holds a lot of truth. I’ve been reading up on the Auto Hop feature since I work for Dish, and even with the Auto Hop, the customer is the one choosing to skip commercials. It’s quite similar to walking out of the room until the show returns or fast-forwarding through commercials with the remote. The day after primetime of the four major networks is recorded; the customer can then choose to watch a recording commercial-free. It’s an advance way of doing what we all already do with commercials, and that’s not watching them, not a crime.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 03 2012, 2:57 AM

Link
71238 whoever posted at 12:51 AM is a genius!
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 04 2012, 10:36 PM

Link
184229 I don’t understand why CBS, FOX, & NBC execs don’t want us to enjoy commercial-free TV. I’m a DISH employee – AutoHop is great because you can easily watch commercial-free TV. Public Knowledge, a consumer advocacy group, is taking a stand for consumers by creating a petition that tells CBS, FOX, & NBC media to keep their hands out of your living room & DVR. Sign their petition to keep control of how you watch TV http://bit.ly/KFdn1Q
oneandonlyme

Posted: Jun 06 2012, 11:26 AM

Link
12229 dont know how skipping an add on TV could possibly be illegal, you dont sign any contracts to watch TV, you need to agree to watch ads, theres no way of really telling whos watching ads and who isnt. Hey, isnt one of the huge draws of the Superbowl every year to see what the ads are? Maybe TV networks should think about lowering their pricing on advertisement space and make it cheaper to advertise, then only show 3, 1 minute adds per half hr. and keep them simple and new. Maybe then folks wont get so bored and turned off and actually watch them or at least tolerate them. Besides, who can tell me how many of these network big shots have a DVR and skip ads? or own a satilite radio?
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 06 2012, 11:31 AM

Link
12229 Just another big business trying to get more blood from the consumer.

And as for you, Cable and Dish providers, I also think its totally bogus that we cant choose the channels we want, instead of offering us those crappy "Packages" with 40 channels we NEVER watch. I only need maybe 10 or so channels, not 5 HBO's, 3 MTV's two VH1's, lord knows how many C-spans or ESPN's there are... C'mon, Im not spanish so I shouldnt have to have a spanish only channel. this is getting silly now.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 06 2012, 1:48 PM

Link
72223 I am really getting sick of the commercials on The Youtube.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 06 2012, 3:50 PM

Link
108203 wait, so these people saying way to go dish. You think it's ok for them to tell you you have to watch commercials? fkin rly??? so now I can't even fast forward through a commercial or im breaking the law? wow this place has gotten nuts!
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 06 2012, 3:52 PM

Link
108203 OK obviously i read the story wrong, seems DISH is the good guy...
Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Cotati, California Cops Enter Disabled Vet's Home, Taze Him in Front Of His Family - 05/14Adam Kokesh Arrested At 'Philly Smoke Down,' Charged With 'Resisting' - 05/19Math Fail: Cop Threatens Charges After Student Blows .018, Says It's 'Double' Limit of .08 - 05/12The Re-Education of Lauryn Hill - 05/16Ky. Cop Robbed Man's Home Under Guise Of 'Executing Search Warrant' - 05/16Police Follow Up Beating A 'Possibly Intoxicated' Man To Death By Seizing Witnesses' Cell Phones - 05/13Think Progress? Ha! - 05/16VP Joe Biden Believes There's 'No Legal Reason' The Government Can't Slap A Sin Tax On 'Violent Media' - 05/16

Cop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The ThroatWhen the Right to Resist Becomes the "Duty to Submit"
(more)

 
Top