|
The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC BlogJul. 20, 2011 |
Popular 
Only 15 Senators Vote to Block Arms to Israel, Despite Majority of Americans Wanting Aid to End
Key October 7th 'Mass Rapes' Witness Featured in Sheryl Sandberg Film 'Exposed as a Serial Liar'
IDF Gunned Down Gaza Paramedics in Clearly Marked Emergency Vehicles, Recovered Video Shows
Rabbi Tells Senate Hearing It's 'Not Enough' to Be 'Not Anti-Semitic' - 'One Must Be Anti-Anti-Semitic'
Trump's 'Liberation Day' Includes Slapping 17% Tariff on Israel
 It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be. 
|
