The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC BlogJul. 20, 2011 |
Group That Plotted to "Kill Elon Musk's Twitter" Collaborated With Israeli Govt, Leaks Reveal
Judge Throws Out Title VI Suit Against Haverford College Aimed at Silencing Criticism of Israel
Biden Awards Presidential Medal of Freedom to George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Bill Nye
Elon Musk Changes X Algorithm After Getting Ratioed for Demanding More H-1B Visas
Elon Musk Defends Censoring Critics, Says First Amendment Does Not Protect 'Paid Speech'
It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be. |