The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC BlogJul. 20, 2011 |
Trump's Demand to Ban Masks at Protests Echoes ADL's Demand Just One Day Prior
HHS Head RFK Jr Declares 'Anti-Semitism' a Public Health Crisis
Trump: Colleges Allowing 'Illegal' Protests Will Lose Federal Funding, 'Agitators' Will Be 'Imprisoned'
Israelis Fear U.S. Could Drop Israel Like It's Dropping Ukraine
Trump Announces U.S. Crypto Reserve, Boosting 'Crypto Barons' And His Own Struggling Memecoin
![]() It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be. |