|
The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC BlogJul. 20, 2011 |
Popular 
Rabbi Tells Senate Hearing It's 'Not Enough' to Be 'Not Anti-Semitic' - 'One Must Be Anti-Anti-Semitic'
Randy Fine Wins Florida House Race After Trump, GOP Scrambled to Prop Up His Campaign
Trump's 'Liberation Day' Includes Slapping 17% Tariff on Israel
Sen. Schumer: 'My Job is to Keep the Left Pro-Israel'
Trump Threatens War With Iran If No Nuclear Deal: 'There Will Be Bombing' Like They've 'Never Seen'
 It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be. 
|
