Proof Digg's Bury Feature Abused to Suppress Controversial ContentChris | Information LiberationFeb. 28, 2007 |
Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie Introduces 'Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act'
Sen. Schumer: 'My Job is to Keep the Left Pro-Israel'
Trump Pulls Stefanik Nomination for U.N. Ambassador Over Fear GOP House Majority Could Evaporate
Randy Fine, Who Celebrated Israel Killing An American Citizen, Struggling in Florida House Race
Trump Strong-Arms Another Law Firm Into Giving Millions in Pro-Bono Work to 'Combat Antisemitism'
![]() Programmer hacks Digg, gets bury list for a few hours: Bury list is full of shills burying highly significant content A programmer found a bug at Digg which allowed him to view the Bury feed at Digg. He posted the list on his website and it is eye opening, to say the least. CLICK HERE TO READ THE LIST Notice how there are tons of obvious shills burying our recent explosive WTC 7 articles as well as many other articles of extreme significance. It's shocking to read the list and see how much significant, documented, and extremely popular content is being buried for obvious ideological reasons. This is completely undemocratic abuse of the Digg system and is proof positive the Bury feature is being abused to suppress content by vindictive Anti-Diggers. From Pronet Advertising: We've heard about a purported 'Bury Brigade' on Digg time and again, with sketchy pieces of evidence here and there but no concrete proof. Until now.Digg's Bury feature is supposed to be used to bury "stories with bad links, off-topic content, or duplicate entries" in order to remove "spam out of the system." Unfortunately, as many have experienced, the Bury feature is frequently used to suppress content based off ideology. Please encourage Digg to either fix it (perhaps make it similar to Reddit's down voting) or remove it all together. Email Digg here and request they please fix the Bury feature. |