NYT Stealth-Edits Headline Claiming U.N. Found 'Evidence' of Hamas RapesChris MenahanInformationLiberation Mar. 05, 2024 |
As Poll Finds Ukrainians Want to End War, U.S. Pushes Zelensky to Bomb Russia and Expand Conscription
FBI Pays Visit to Pro-Palestine Journalist Alison Weir's Home
Schumer Moves to Silence Criticism of Israel as Hate Speech With 'Antisemitism Awareness Act'
Federal Judge Orders Hearing Into Questionable 'Auction' of Infowars to The Onion
'More Winning!' Ben Shapiro Celebrates Trump Assembling an Israel First Cabinet
The New York Times, which is on the ropes over their "Hamas mass rapes" story falling apart, tried to prop up their failing narrative by falsely claiming the UN found "clear and convincing evidence" of sexual assault.
Times journalist Farnaz Fassihi appears to have blocked Blumenthal on Twitter for pointing this out. She also blocked anyone from commenting on her tweets. They didn't find "evidence" of anything as they were blocked from doing any serious investigation by the Israeli government.
Max Blumenthal wrote Monday on Twitter: At presser just now, Patten claims "sexual violence occurred on 7 October," yet concedes:
Blumenthal added on Tuesday: Western media hyping Pramila Patten’s UN report as proof of “Hamas mass rape” left out a key section which
The report actually undermined many of the lies spread by the New York Times (full image here):
The media outlets which pushed the hoax are now citing the UN's report to prop up their lies:
The Intercept, meanwhile, released another report noting how multiple of the "victims specifically singled out by the New York Times" were not victims at all, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be'eri.
There's no "reasonable grounds" to believe any of the claims about "Hamas mass rapes" because no actual evidence has ever been produced. The media is simply repeating their "Big Lie" over and over again in the hope that people will believe it. Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Minds and Telegram. |