Judge Rules for Ghislaine Maxwell in Huge Setback to Victims and Boon to Epstein Accomplicesby Colin KalmbacherLaw & Crime Feb. 28, 2020 |
'The First Live-Streamed Genocide': Al Jazeera Documentary Exposes Israeli War Crimes in Gaza
Bill Kristol: My Fellow White Americans Are 'The Enemy'
WashPo: Netanyahu Tells U.S. That Israel Will Not Strike Iranian Nuclear or Oil Sites
Biden's Lebanon Envoy, Ex-Israeli Soldier Amos Hochstein, Gave Israel 'Green Light' to Invade Lebanon
WATCH: New Film 'Atrocity Inc' Exposes How Israel Lied About October 7th to Justify Genocide
A federal judge in Manhattan has denied a media request to presume that the public should have access to an infamous and long-sought trove of documents related to dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. In a terse four-page ruling, Judge Loretta Preska ruled against reporter Julie K. Brown and The Miami Herald in what’s sure to be seen as a slap in the face to the dozens of victims ensnared by Epstein’s elite pedophile ring over the course of several years. “[Brown and the Herald‘s] argument is ostensibly that this unsealing process requires the Court to evaluate the Aristotelian essence of a document, i.e., to decide that certain documents are imbued with an inherent, free-floating power to influence judicial decision-making that makes them necessarily subject to the presumption of public access,” Preska wrote in a sharp and mocking decision. “The Court has . . . already considered and rejected the exact contention [Brown and the Herald] advance here: that judicial documents can be categorized as such based on their abstract, generalized effect on judicial decisions rather than in the context of a decided motion,” the New York City judge continued. “That [Brown and the Herald] have found alternative dress for that position does not provide grounds for reconsideration.” Read More |