Pat Buchanan: Appoint A Special Prosecutor For Criminal LeaksPatrick J. BuchananMay. 23, 2017 |
Netanyahu Cries 'Antisemitism' After International Criminal Court Issues Warrant for His Arrest
Trump Nominates Pam Bondi for Attorney General
Schumer Moves to Silence Criticism of Israel as Hate Speech With 'Antisemitism Awareness Act'
FBI Pays Visit to Pro-Palestine Journalist Alison Weir's Home
Matt Gaetz Withdraws from Consideration as Attorney General
Who is the real threat to the national security? Is it President Trump who shared with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov the intelligence that ISIS was developing laptop bombs to put aboard airliners? Or is it The Washington Post that ferreted out and published this code-word intelligence, and splashed the details on its front page, alerting the world, and ISIS, to what we knew. President Trump has the authority to declassify security secrets. And in sharing that intel with the Russians, who have had airliners taken down by bombs, he was trying to restore a relationship. On fighting Islamist terror, we and the Russians agree. Five years ago, Russia alerted us that Tamerlan Tsarnaev had become a violent radical Islamist. That was a year and a half before Tsarnaev carried out the Boston Marathon bombing. But upon what authority did The Washington Post reveal code-word intelligence secrets? Where in the Constitution or U.S. law did the Post get the right to reveal state secrets every U.S. citizen is duty bound to protect? The source of this top secret laptop-bomb leak that the Post published had to be someone in the intel community who was violating an oath that he had sworn to protect U.S. secrets, and committing a felony by leaking that secret. Those who leaked this to hurt Trump, and those who published this in the belief it would hurt Trump, sees themselves as the “Resistance” — like the French Resistance to Vichy in World War II. And they seemingly see themselves as above the laws that bind the rest of us. Read More |