Ann Coulter: Your Choice--A Green America or a Brown AmericaAnn CoulterApr. 20, 2017 |
Netanyahu Cries 'Antisemitism' After International Criminal Court Issues Warrant for His Arrest
Trump Nominates Pam Bondi for Attorney General
Schumer Moves to Silence Criticism of Israel as Hate Speech With 'Antisemitism Awareness Act'
FBI Pays Visit to Pro-Palestine Journalist Alison Weir's Home
Matt Gaetz Withdraws from Consideration as Attorney General
In celebration of Earth Day this Saturday, let's review how the Sierra Club sold its soul and screwed the Earth for a $100 million donation. They must hate themselves for it, so why shouldn't we hate them, too? After Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration act began dumping millions of Third-Worlders on the country, the Sierra Club talked of little else besides reducing immigration. In 1970, the club adopted a resolution complaining that the country's growing population was polluting the "air, water and land" -- to the point that "our very survival (is) threatened." In 1978, the Sierra Club adopted a resolution urging Congress to "conduct a thorough examination of U.S. immigration laws," noting that the United States, Canada and Australia were the only countries admitting "more than a handful of permanent immigrants." In 1980, the club dropped its promotion of birth control, in order to focus on immigration. "It is obvious," the club said, "that the numbers of immigrants the United States accepts affects our population size and growth rate," even more than "the number of children per family." In 1989, the club's Population Report expressly called for reducing the number of immigrants. In 1990, the club's grassroots leaders voted overwhelmingly to launch a major national campaign on the immigration problem. Even people who don't live in yurts can't help but notice the environmental damage being done by hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans clamoring across the border every year, setting fires, dumping litter, spray-painting gang signs in our parks and defacing ancient Indian petroglyphs. The problem isn't just the number of people traipsing through our wilderness areas; it's that primitive societies have no concept of "litter." That's a quirk of prosperous societies. The damage to our parks shows these cultural differences. Writing in an environmental journal at New York University, Rosa P. Oakes described the "reprehensible" damage being done to "towering cactus, Joshua trees, flowering cactus varieties, colorful wildflowers and rock formations" by illegals. With accompanying photos, she noted that the immigrants' litter included "abandoned vehicles ... used needles, drug paraphernalia, plastic grocery bags, paper products, empty water containers, blankets, clothing, used disposable diapers, among other things." The Mexican cultural trait of littering is apparently well known to everyone -- except American journalists. Read More |