informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Multimedia posted May 31 2010, 7:59 AM Category: Economy Source: YouTube Print

Is Limited Government an Oxymoron? | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.


If you give an institution the monopoly power to tax and a monopoly over courts, how can you expect it not to become an out of control tyranny?

All monopolies lead to worse service and increased costs, the idea you would set your government up as a total monopoly is absolutely absurd.

There are a few solutions, one of them is to break up the US into 20,000 separate republics like Lew Rockwell talked about, this would force people to engage in free trade and the incentive structure would be changed because people could vote with their feet and move out of any jurisdiction which was taxing them too much or was out of control in any way.

A much better solution, I believe, is what Hans-Hermann Hoppe talks about which is creating a private sector for all the government industry.

Everyone would buy insurance to protect themselves and everyone would be armed and be able to hire police to defend their property.

The judicial system would be done by the insurance courts and there would be simple laws and actual incentive to give good judgments.

People would be free to live as they please on their own private property and there would be no forced integration and no system of coercion.

People would interact only out of their own volition and could vote with their dollars.

No one would be ruling over anyone yet the society would be completely civilized and have a powerful judiciary and a strong guerrilla army.

There could be no wars of aggression because there would be no state, and if anyone tried to invade us, to quote one Japanese General, "there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

We would quickly become the most prosperous nation on earth because that's the product of freedom. We would set the perfect example for the world and it would be like the US in the glory days right after the revolution.

Now THAT'S change I can believe in! - Chris, InfoLib

Joining host Dennis McCuistion, Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (Ludwig von Mises Institute) and Doug Casey ("The Casey Report") focus their discussion on the credit crisis, free markets and limited government.

This video was made available by Dr. Woods, and is posted with permission from McCuistion TV. Copyrighted McCuistion Productions, Inc. McCuistionTV.com





Latest Economy
- Venezuela: World's Highest Inflation Rate
- Uber Faces Potentially Devastating Court Ruling
- The Forgotten Depression
- What Peter Schiff Said To Ben Bernanke
- Jeffrey Tucker Talks Bitcoin On Fox Business
- New Gold Backed Cryptocurrency Has Been Announced
- The High Cost of Centrally Planning the Global Climate
- Snapchat CEO On FB, Twitter, & The Tech Bubble









Comments Add Comment Page 1 of 1
anMD

Posted: Jun 01 2010, 3:11 PM

Link
20959 Great presentation.

I agree that even a limited government structure eventually disintegrates into tyranny, since - as with every hierarchical power structure in society - the psychopaths inevitably seize the reigns of power and network with one another to maintain and preserve their dysfunctional status quo.

As "success" is equated to ascent in the power and status ladder, sociopathic behaviors to achieve these goals are modeled to please the psychopaths in charge (which hold the key to allow like-minded people into their elite circle). This attitude becomes slowly integrated in the societal zeitgeist, and even quietly allowed/sanctioned. This "new normal" then serves as a basis for progressive moral degeneration, which through its Pavlovian conditioning mechanisms then becomes gradually accepted in society and further displayed by the "leaders" and their elite circles (covertly or overtly). The dysfunctional behavior, power-seeking and the degradation of the general moral environment then perpetuates itself in a progressive downfall, aided by education, social and economic pressures in society. So, in conclusion, I think limited government is an oxymoron.

Anarchism, on the other hand is neither an oxymoron nor a utopia. 2 examples: Celtic society thrived for 1000 years with a anarchic economic-politico-social system. Catalonia thrived for 3 years in 1930s Spain until communist and fascist forces destroyed their achievements and social structure during the Spanish Civil War.

It is doable. The problem - as Tom Woods explains- is one of education and ... of courage (i.e. undertaking all the responsibilities that real freedom entails). The current socio-political-educational environment achieved through years of psychopathic control and Pavlovian conditioning is what makes anarchism seem unreachable.

Participation in a "lesser evil" (i.e. limited constitutional republic) as a stepwise progression towards socio-economic-political anarchism is perhaps the most realistic way to proceed given the current state of affairs, in my humble view.

References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Catalonia


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

The NSA's Technotyranny: One Nation Under Surveillance - 05/27Student Punished for Bringing Hot Pepper to School - 05/29California Adult Film Regulations Mandate 'Protective Eye Gear,' Vaccines - 05/29Federal Judge Believes Motorist, Not Cop, In Traffic Stop - 05/28The Deeply Tragic Sentencing of Ross Ulbricht - 05/29Whether in the USSR or USSA, Politicians Come and Go -- But the Security Organs Remain - 05/29Silk Road Mastermind Ross Ulbricht Sentenced To Life In Prison - 05/29Dallas PD Guts Specifics From Citizen Recording Policy, Leaving Only Vague Reminder To Respect Pre-Existing Rights - 05/29

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top