DOJ Tells Judges They Don't Get A Say In Whether Information Is ClassifiedBy Cory DoctorowBoing Boing May. 09, 2015 |
House Passes $95B Foreign Aid Giveaway to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan, Combined With TikTok Ban
Senate Passes FISA Spying Bill, Includes New Measure to Turn U.S. Businesses Into NSA Spies
AP: 'Israeli Strikes on Gaza City of Rafah Kill 22, Mostly Children, as U.S. Advances Aid Package'
John Podhoretz Demands National Guard Be Sent Into Columbia U to Put Down Pro-Palestine Protests
The Guardian on Papua New Guinea Cannibalism: People Were Eaten 'Out of Respect'
DOJ lawyer Catherine Dorsey: "We don't think there is a First Amendment right to classified documents" -- she was seeking to suppress evidence of force-feeding torture in Gitmo. She was speaking on behalf of the "most transparent administration in history (TM)." The judges at the D.C. Court of Appeals appeared skeptical. Chief Judge Merrick Garland characterized the government's position as tantamount to claiming the court "has absolutely no authority" to unseal evidence even if it's clear the government's bid to keep it secret is based on "irrationality" or that it's "hiding something."U.S. Government: We Can Classify Anything and Judges Can't Stop Us [Sam Sacks/The Intercept] |