informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Apr 24 2012, 11:58 PM Category: Economy Source: Wendy McElroy Print

The Death of All Banking Freedom?

by Wendy McElroy, The Future of Freedom Foundation

Last week, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) extended its reach and tightened its grip on every cent Americans earn or try to preserve anywhere in the world. The final regulations of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) were announced.

Enacted in March 2010 as part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act, FATCA seeks to have foreign financial institutions report on accounts held by any American living in the United States or abroad. You can take your money and run, but you cannot hide from an IRS that functions as a taxation clearing house to the world. If you have never lived in the United States but have American parents, then you will still fall under the jurisdiction of the IRS and the Department of the Treasury. Only the costly and cumbersome act of renouncing American citizenship can provide protection.

Americans are already required by tax law to disclose any foreign accounts that total more than $10,000; that controversial requirement is called the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, or FBAR. (FATCA broadens the sort of assets that must be reported and raises the reporting requirement to $50,000 for an individual or $100,000 for a couple.) But using FBAR to rake in money that has fled to more friendly environs relies too much on the voluntary compliance of foreign-account holders.

FATCA is supposed to bypass this need and supplement FBAR. And it is expected to do so by January 1, 2014, when the final regulations are slated to go into effect.

The final regulations

Law professor Alan Appel provides an example of one "incentive" that will be applied to financial institutions. Appel explains,
These foreign banks, which are called foreign financial institutions, or FFIs, and also foreign entities that are not banks — called non-financial foreign entities, or NFFEs [for example securities brokerages] — have to enter into a compliance agreement with the IRS starting Jan. 1, 2013 … they’ll agree to basically [disclose] the names, Social Security numbers and account balances of U.S. [account holders] every year. … And if they don’t enter into this agreement and they invest in U.S. stocks or securities, or have any U.S. source income, then there’s going to be a 30 percent withholding tax on all payments, including interest, rents, royalties, and things like that.
To make foreign governments more receptive, the IRS has a new ruling, Treasury Decision 9584, “Guidance on Reporting Interest Paid to Nonresident Aliens.” It aims at achieving at least three goals:
  • to forge information-sharing agreements with foreign governments;
  • to “persuade” foreign institutions to cooperate;
  • and thereby to reduce the number of stubborn Americans who still refuse to comply.
TD 9584 states,
Under present law, the measures available to assist the United States in obtaining this information include both treaty relationships and statutory provisions. The effectiveness of these measures depends significantly, however, on the United States’ ability to reciprocate.
In short, the IRS seeks a worldwide sharing of information on all money owned and invested, a sharing that would “benefit” other governments as well. The document continues, “In many cases, however, the implementation of FATCA will require the cooperation of foreign governments in order to overcome legal impediments to reporting by their resident financial institutions.” The IRS wants foreign governments to change their laws — for example, ones that protect financial privacy — in order to facilitate a more efficient tax grab.

Nevertheless, if a nation does not wish to change its laws for the IRS, TD 9584 notes,
Under this global standard [the OECD Model Tax Convention and other accords] a country cannot refuse to share tax information based on domestic laws that do not require banks to share the information. In addition, under the global standard, a country cannot opt out of information exchange based on the fact that the country does not itself need the information to enforce its own tax rules.
To ferret out the last of the tax scofflaws, TD 9584 explains,
The reporting of information required by these regulations will also directly enhance U.S. tax compliance by making it more difficult for U.S. taxpayers with U.S. deposits to falsely claim to be nonresidents in order to avoid U.S. taxation on their deposit interest income.
Of course, Americans living abroad often pay taxes to the land in which they reside, but the IRS wishes to impose an additional tax; in this policy, the United States is almost unique. If the global sharing of financial information materializes, however, other cash-strapped nations will almost certainly follow suit.

The world reacts

Many nations are resisting. On April 23, the Asian Investor stated a common criticism: “some say the new legislation will make foreign financial institutions de-facto tax enforcement agents of the IRS.”

Meanwhile, others are signing on board. Several weeks ago, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK issued a joint statement with the U.S. Treasury Department expressing support of FATCA. It is difficult to predict how successful the IRS will be in its game of carrot and stick.

But even a bungling attempt to enforce this statist horror could dramatically change the world's banking and financial practices, sweeping away the remnants of privacy.

It would have other devastating impacts as well. American tax attorney Phil Hodgen expresses one of them,
It is obvious hypocrisy to allow U.S. banks to hide U.S.-source income information while strong-arming other countries (and their banks) into disclosing information about U.S. taxpayers.
The IRS has backed itself into this corner and must force disclosure of interest paid to nonresidents or be laughed out of the diplomatic room. The move will have predictable consequences for U.S. banks. I would expect capital flight to commence. I already encourage nonresident clients to bank outside the United States, as much for the paperwork problems as anything else. This will add one more reason for them to avoid bringing capital to the United States.
__
Wendy McElroy is the author of The Reasonable Woman: A Guide to Intellectual Survival (Prometheus Books, 1998). She actively manages two websites: http://www.ifeminists.com and http://www.wendymcelroy.com. For additional articles on current events by Ms. McElroy, please visit the Commentary section of our website. Send her email





Latest Economy
- NYC Says Renting Out Your Place Via Airbnb Is Running An Illegal Hotel
- Should Bitcoin Be Regulated Like Dollars?
- How to Not Attack Capitalism
- How Protectionism Hurts Hawaii: Why It's Time to Repeal the Jones Act
- If It Moves, Tax It
- Taxing Internet Purchases
- Ron Paul on Gold: No One Knows Value; I'm Buying
- Schiff: GDP Propaganda Exposed









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 25 2012, 5:58 AM

Link
10815 So in other words, American companies will have foreign capitol removed them and an already ailing economy will degrade even further? The depravity of man. Will they say the higher taxes that result is all for our benefit?
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 25 2012, 3:16 PM

Link
71194 The Rothschild banking empire knows no bounds.
Anonymous

Posted: May 15 2012, 4:54 AM

Link
1188 It seems to me FATCA is just in preparation for exchange controls. When the Government knows all the assets owned by American citizens it can implement controls on the movement of dollars, or even direct taxation of assets. Presumably in preparation for devaluation.

My company has investigated the implications of FATCA and we will close our US company and terminate all our US based staff before the end of the year, then contract out as necessary. We will also terminate all US citizens working for our company outside the US. The cost of compliance is not worth it.

How these add-on regulations could be inserted into a so-called employment act is beyond belief. Though we are familiar with this tactic used by the US Government.

From what we understand May 15th is the drop dead date, so if no changes are made before that date FATCA becomes law on January 1st., 2013.

Several of our employees in Europe and Asia, who are US citizens or Green Card holders are considering giving up their US status as they feel the Government's intrusion into their personal life, and the hidden agenda for what comes next, is too dangerous for their personal freedom and financial future. If they do we can continue to employ them as FATCA will no longer apply to them.

Our company has a sister company that is a FFI. The Board has decided to terminate all accounts, including banking and investment, for all US citizens. They will therefore not be required to show FATCA compliance.

Good luck America, this is just another nail in your coffin.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Newly Released Video Shows Idaho Cop Kill Man Who Surrendered With Hands Above Head - 05/22Video: Control Freak Rentacop Goes Off on Trespassers - 05/22Durham Cop Threatens to Beat Citizen & Plant Cocaine on Him - 05/22Police State: Liberty Activist Illegally Searched and Arrested After Kokesh Hearing - 05/22California Cop Panics Over Cell Phone Camera, Thinking it Could be a Gun - 05/22So It's Come To This: Seven High School Students Arrested For Throwing... Water Balloons - 05/23How Private Policing Trumps Government Law Enforcement - 05/22Video: City Changes Parking Signs, Tickets Cars That Were Parked Legally - 05/23

Cop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The ThroatWhen the Right to Resist Becomes the "Duty to Submit"
(more)

 
Top