The news you're not supposed to know...

Multimedia

An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off

The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires

The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand

Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"

The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future (more)

Analysis posted Aug 18 2009, 2:52 PM

Category: Commentary

Source: InformationLiberation

Dealing with the Brainwashed Masses

A Truther's Guide to The Galaxy

Many people who are just recently waking up are not sure how to deal with people who are brainwashed. They wish to help them but they don't know how exactly to go by doing it. I am not advocated some sort of "method" or anything of the sort, but I would like to explain some common pitfalls and misperceptions people have about how to deal with these "types."

Television especially tries to turn us all into marketers, we are told we need to "sell ourselves" etc. and "create an image" and blah blah blah. This can rub off on you in ways you do not even realize, for example, many people waste a lot of their time trying to convince brainwashed people that they are right and the other person is wrong. The problem with this is the brainwashed person is not privy to all the information you are privy too, be it due to willful ignorance or just simply being uninformed, they cannot process your level of thought because it is completely foreign to them. Even if it stings your tongue, you have to try and work with them first, understand where they are coming from, and then explain to them in as straightforward a manner as possible "the way things are."

Lots of people want to tailor their message special to suit the person, that is fine to an extent, but I believe if it removes your quality of being straightforward (because you're trying to "sell" someone on an idea) then it loses a lot of its power and effectiveness. People need to be told the truth, the truth will set you free, I know in my own personal life that the truth hurts, but it is the only thing which will set you free, and that's the god damnedest truth! That is why I try to be as straightforward and truthful as I possibly can be, only a true friend will put their friendship on the line by telling you something you don't want to hear, because some things are more important than being liked.

The reality is telling someone the truth is the most respectful and caring thing you can do, it is also one of the most difficult, but that is only the case because people are surrounded by so many lies. When you become truthful in your entire way of being it is like opening up a door to a new reality, a world of honesty and acceptance and appreciation for the world and people as a whole. When you're living a lie you have nothing, can be nothing, and can accomplish nothing, you're a perpetual misery machine. It is a miserable existence but people do it because it allows them to fit in, our society is sick, living truthfully and honestly is the only cure. - Chris, InformationLiberation

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Commentary
- Venus Needs Some Austrians
- 10 Statist Myths Debunked
- A Culture of Fear
- White House Plans Another Fake End to Iraq War
- The State's Bad Math
- Ayn Rand's message to Glenn Beck
- The Friends of the "Free Market" Are Its Worst Enemies
- The Market as a Redistributor of Wealth

Comments 1 - 20 of 21

Add Comment

Page of 2 >

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 18 2009, 8:44 PM

Link

6050

those who control the questions,control all the answers.

another underlying problem is to get at the root of this reality leads one beyond all cultural norms....most of the american gene
pool has been so weakened by chemical elements (food,
air,water) plus the electronic and ionic poisons, that to make the transition to revolutionary awareness may be impossible.

sad to say, from my personal observation and experience, the USA is doomed by a dumbed down populace.

case in point, to have glenn beck communicating the wisdom of thomas paine is a perfect example of how far truths have fallen.

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 18 2009, 10:12 PM

Link

206173

WHERE WERE THE PROTESTS THEN?

"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

I've talked to three people who were either present for the meeting that day or had knowledge of what happened inside the meeting and they all says the President of the United States called the Constitution "a goddamned piece of paper."

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 18 2009, 10:14 PM

Link

206173

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
206.173.XXX.XXX

Posted: Aug 18 2009, 10:57 PM

Link

71198

Chris,
In regards to the post linked on the front page where you argue with some dude,

I agree that we must be straightforward with the truth but there is difference between that and confrontation. The truth is the dude was brainwashed, but he is brainwashed to much lesser an extent than the majority. We need people like that, who are close to the edge but not yet willing to take the jump, on our side. Because once they go, others will follow and we MUST have more people wake up, because our strength is in our vast number (relatively speaking, compared to the elite). I, and I daresay you and everybody else here, were similar to that dude at one point, caught up in our minds and the manipulation. Perhaps we weren't as close-minded as that guy (which is a judge of character and may justify his abuse), but we were still "brainwashed".

My point is that we need more people to wake up and calling them brainwashed DIRECTLY is going to push them away from the truth because they will associate it with hostility. We can say it amongst ourselves because we know it is the truth, but it won't wake them up if we use that language amongst them.

Great site you guys have here, BTW. Thank ya'll for the hard work!

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 18 2009, 10:57 PM

Link

206173

JUST START LISTENING
TO MIKE MALLOY !
NO BULLSHIT HERE !
http://www.1480kphx.com/
9-5 pm EST.
And it is free!

MALLOY IS THE TRUTH

Chris

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 2:00 AM

Link

Dare! I have a whole website up dedicated to my own foolishness! (listenlittleman.com) ;) I am all for a million different ways of handling things, the important thing in my opinion though is to work WITH THEM and not simply force them or coerce them through "strategies" (basically just nlp-type hypnosis) because it won't create any deep fundamental change.

This is just my style for the time being, I work hard to simply express whatever comes to my mind without blocking or suppressing my spirit or whatever you want to call it, I just find it a better way to live and a more honest way to be, the more open I become the more powerful and imbued with spirit everything I do becomes. I just feel so blessed to be alive and actually living and it kills me inside to see people murdering themselves from within.

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 6:50 AM

Link

19324

You want people to listen? The answer is quite simple: you need evidence to back up your claims.

KFC

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 8:03 AM

Link

8558

193.24.xxx xxx
If you wern't a shill i'd give you a list of evidence and being a shill you would be a part of that evidence.
You know the truth but are scared shitless to admit it.

Vaccination will be the only evidence you will need.
But i'm sorry to say it'll be too late by then.

Go sell your wares elswhere.

friendstacy

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 8:14 AM

Link

"You know the truth but are scared shitless to admit it."

that's it in a nutshell. they already know. they are just too afraid of the bullies (like these here trolls) and their threats to say what they really think. to accept the brainwashing is a choice. it is their decision to make. they are too afraid not to repeat what they have been told to believe, because that's what they think everyone else believes. but it's all lies, and everybody already knows it. they just won't admit it.

Dave

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 9:22 AM

Link

We compare what we see with what we already think we know, thus once fooled without realising it or by accepting it we can be fooled again. I would personally substitue word guidlines for rules:

<Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed
with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of theircharacter by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.>
http://www.proparanoid.net/mcr.htm

If you wanted to fool the world, how would you do it? In the case of counter intelligence, what is publicly known as mi6, cia etc, rule 13 applies inside and out.

Dave

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 9:59 AM

Link

For dictating group results with some deniability, the delphi method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method
http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 11:47 AM

Link

19324

KFC, curious response. Shill for what exactly? I'm not selling anything. I'm just trying to help, albeit from a deeply sceptical standpoint.

This post is about telling people the "truth" and waking them up from their "brainwashed" state. How can you expect them to accept your views without backing them up? This is simple Persuasion 101.

People aren't going to accept your views on faith - you lot are no better than a religion without evidence.

Chris

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 1:12 PM

Link

^ lol. The world is at your fingertips, you can search and learn about anything you wish at any time you wish anywhere you wish... Yet this is what you produce. That is grounds for deep heartbreaking sorrow... =/

Jamie

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 2:41 PM

Link

928

Most people who have done their research can see the lies in front of their very face. Take a look around at the world we live in once in a while.

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 19 2009, 4:35 PM

Link

206173

Look carefully at these 14 points of Fascism

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people�s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice�relentless propaganda and disinformation�were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite �spontaneous� acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and �terrorists.� Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes� excesses.

7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting �national security,� and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite�s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the �godless.� A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of �have-not� citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. �Normal� and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or �traitors� was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.

14 Points of fascism: The warning signs

In his original article, "Fascism Anyone?", Laurence Britt (interview) compared the regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto, and Pinochet and identified 14 characteristics common to those fascist regimes. This page is a collection of news articles dating from the start of the Bush presidency divided into topics relating to each of the 14 points of fascism. Further analysis of American Fascism done by the POAC can be read here.
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm

Chris

Posted: Aug 20 2009, 2:47 AM

Link

It should be noted the new religion is global warming, a` la ecofascism.

fred

Posted: Aug 20 2009, 6:59 AM

Link

On the subject of brainwashing:

How To Brainwash A Nation
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/28625/How_To_Brainwash_A_Nation/

Dave

Posted: Aug 20 2009, 4:49 PM

Link

Following up on your post Fred, David Miliband heading up the UK foreign office would by intention be dictating such policy to obama and other pupperts around the world.

<David Miliband is the elder son of Polish-born Marion Kozak and the late Belgian-born Marxist intellectual Ralph Miliband>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Miliband

I have covered David Miliband often here for such reasons, programming international journalists, speaking at the royal society (they like to be known as chatham house but I find that deceptive, hence use RIIA and or royal society). He seems to have a similar psyops pack to tony blair, he appeared on the public stage out of no where lying through his teeth.

To summarise your video link the chap assert spying accounts for about 15% of resources, the main activity being counter intelligence though he uses different words. He puts the steps in controlling a nation as:
1 demoralization
2 destabilization
3 crisis
4 normalization

clare

Posted: Aug 22 2009, 8:04 PM

Link

83227

193.24.XXX.XXX:
Well, I understand that you want evidence for the contrary of what you "believe"... But have you thought about what "evidence" YOU have for the things you believe?
I mean, the things you are sceptical about is just sceptism against the sources thant you blindly believe in...
WHO says what is "facts"?

I�m also sceptical, that does that I QUESTION, do YOU question?

(I�m not trying to be ignorant or to be meen, just wanted to talk about your proof, hope you don�t take this badly)

Live well everybody... Hope the masses wakes up soon,,, I feel I will give up soon...

My best wishes

Posted: Aug 29 2009, 2:06 AM

Link

76174

I still want to know what "truth" it is that everyone is telling everyone or can tell anyone, for that matter. I guess I am hoping that I can create a methodology to take the information I receive, place it in some computer, have the computer do some fact checking and consolidate it into some "truth" for me. My question is: How do you know what the truth is? What if what you are spouting as truth, is in fact, a lie? Would your happiness then be misplaced? I remember times when I was so indignant about a certain thing, only to find that I didn't have all the facts and was reacting to a 1/2 truth...See how confusing it can be??? I find it interesting that one can tell if another is "murdering themselves from within". Trust me, the people that don't know what is going on are much happier than I am!!! My who life has been blown apart by this TRUTH and I am totally screwed now because everything I thought was true isn't what I thought it to be and I used to want to be a millionaire but now I know that my federal reserve notes aren't worth Jack!!! : )!

Comments 1 - 20 of 21

Page of 2 >

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill